Fin replacement

The Fin replacement that works inside your product

Fin answers questions about your product in a chat window. Deway resolves them inside the product itself. Cheaper, live in 72 hours, and nothing for your team to maintain.

Free proof of concept for teams that apply. One line of code.

Cheaper

Fin bills you per resolution, on top of your Intercom seats. The better it does, the more you pay. Deway starts with a free proof of concept and prices by usage, not by taxing every ticket.

Faster

One line of code, live in 72 hours. And faster for your users too: instead of a chat back-and-forth about the product, Deway guides them through the actual steps, in the product, in real time.

No maintenance

Fin is only as good as the help center you keep writing for it. Deway learns your product itself, adapts when it changes, and never asks your team to update an article.

Side by side

Deway vs. Fin

Where it works

FinIn the chat widget. Users stop what they are doing to ask.
DewayInside your product, while the user works.

What it does

FinAnswers questions with text pulled from your docs.
DewayGuides users through the actual steps to the outcome.

Setup

FinConnect your stack, then curate the content Fin answers from.
Deway72 hours. One line of code.

Maintenance

FinAnswer quality depends on keeping your knowledge base current.
DewayLearns the product itself. Nothing to write or update.

Broken flows

FinCannot tell a confused user from a broken flow.
DewayDetects broken flows and escalates with full context.

Pricing

FinPer resolution, on top of platform seats. Grows with volume.
DewayFree proof of concept. Then pricing by usage.

Escalation

FinHands off to a human agent in the same chat.
DewayRoutes to product and CS teams with full session context.

Scales with

FinMore articles written and more resolutions billed.
DewayMore data.

Answering about the product vs. resolving inside it

Fin lives in the chat widget. A user gets stuck, leaves what they were doing, opens a conversation, and gets a text answer assembled from your help center. Then they go back and try to follow it. Deway skips all of that. It sees what the user is trying to do and guides them through the actual steps, in the product, at the moment they are stuck. The question gets resolved before it becomes a ticket.

Cheaper: your bill should not scale with your ticket volume

Fin charges per resolution, on top of the seats you already pay for. That means your costs grow with exactly the thing you are trying to reduce. Deway inverts it: a free proof of concept up front, then pricing by usage. And because it resolves issues in the product, ticket volume goes down instead of getting monetized.

No maintenance: no knowledge base to feed

Fin is only as good as the documentation behind it. Every new feature needs an article, every product change makes an old answer wrong, and someone on your team owns that forever. Deway does not read your docs. It learns your product directly, in 72 hours, and keeps learning as the product changes. There is nothing to write, tag, or update.

When Fin is the right choice

If most of your support volume is not about using the product, things like billing disputes, account changes, or order status, a chat-based agent on top of your support platform makes sense, and Fin is a strong one. If your tickets are users stuck inside your product, answering them in chat is the long way around. That is what Deway replaces.

Frequently asked

Apply for a free proof of concept

One line of code. Live in 72 hours. Measure the results before you pay anything.